Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

If you are an end-user type organization, the fee is only $100/year
for all your resources, IPv4 and IPv6 included.  Is that really what
you would call significant?

Owen

On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:59 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:

> Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only.
>
> Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them
> will result in the ceding of legacy rights. 
> We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. 
> Thanks everyone for the info.
>
> John
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Greco" <jgreco () ns sol net>
> To: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>
> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM
> Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
>
>
> > It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
> > moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
> > a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
> > We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee.  As it stands, there
> > isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the
> > form of the fees.
> > ... JG
> > --