nanog mailing list archives
Re: what about 48 bits?
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:06:24 -0700
Nick Hilliard wrote:
On an even more unrelated note, does anyone remember the day that CMU-TEK tcp/ip stopped working some time in the early 1990s? That was a load of fun.
I remember a satellite taking care of trans-Atlantic internet traffic going down in the mid 90s causing 30 minute lags on irc, if that counts. :-)
Current thread:
- Re: what about 48 bits?, (continued)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Bill Bogstad (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Nick Hilliard (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Vince Fuller (Apr 08)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Barry Shein (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Bill Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Stephen Sprunk (Apr 06)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 06)
- Re: what about 48 bits? John Kristoff (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Roland Perry (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Joe Greco (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Roland Perry (Apr 07)