nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
From: Bob Poortinga <bobp+nanog () webster tsc com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:13:20 -0400
Jay Hennigan <jay () west net> writes:
We just got Cyclops alerts showing several of our prefixes sourced from AS23474 propagating through AS4134. Anyone else?
For the record, yes. Two of our blocks were announced via 7575 4134 23724 yesterday. First seen by Cyclops at 2010-04-08 15:57:13 UTC and lasted about 20 minutes. Does AS7575, Australian Academic and Reasearch Network, do any filtering? -- Bob Poortinga K9SQL <http://www.linkedin.com/in/bobpoortinga> Technology Service Corp. <http://www.tsc.com> Bloomington, Indiana US
Current thread:
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?, (continued)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Burwell (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Patrick Giagnocavo (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Warren Bailey (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Templin (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)