nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:56:49 -0700
Benjamin BILLON wrote:
So basically, the idea is to disconnect China's Internet even more than what it inflicts to itself?
And that is wrong why exactly? ;-)
How fun. What was the FCC/Comcast case about again?
It's only port 25, at least here: http://www.okean.com/antispam/iptables/iptables.html
Current thread:
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?, (continued)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Danny McPherson (Apr 08)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Brielle Bruns (Apr 08)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Danny McPherson (Apr 08)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? James Hess (Apr 08)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? goemon (Apr 08)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? George Bonser (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? goemon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Larry Smith (Apr 08)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Michael Holstein (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin BILLON (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin Billon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin Billon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Burwell (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Patrick Giagnocavo (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Warren Bailey (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Templin (Apr 09)