nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:26:45 +0900
plenty of people have accused ipv6 of being a solution in search of a problem. on this very mailing list within the last 72 hours i've seen another person assert that "ipv6 isn't needed." while i tend to agree with tony li who of ipv6 famously said it was "too little and too soon" we have been Overtaken By Events and we now have to deploy it "or else".
http://www.hactrn.net/sra/vorlons
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 William Warren (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Florian Weimer (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 04)