nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mikrotik RouterOS
From: Positively Optimistic <positivelyoptimistic () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:05:57 -0400
We use mikrotik in several enterprise networks and on our carrier ethernet network. We use their routerboard products as CPE in a lot of customer environments. They have a failure rate.. as does Cisco, Adtran, etc. IMHO, any device that depends on a wall wart for a power supply, is subject to occasional failure.. However, we've had as many adtran total access products fail as we've had mikrotik routerboards fail.. The powerrouter product that Dennis has referred to, although he may be more biased than I, is a solid product that I personally feel is carrier grade. Especially with redundant power or a DC power option.. I'm far from an expert in cisco or mikrotik, however, to accomplish the same end result with Cisco that is possible with Mikrotik, the cost is exponentially greater,.. Disclaimer.. I have zero financial interest in Mikrotik. Simply a loyal customer. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () Janoszka pl> writes:On 12-4-2010 21:44, Gustavo Santos wrote:its was an old bug, that had been fixed for a while..You should still keep in mind Mikrotik is just Linux, with all its (dis)advantages, plus some scripts and weird CLI.Just like IOS XE... Bjørn
Current thread:
- RE: Mikrotik RouterOS, (continued)
- RE: Mikrotik RouterOS Dennis Burgess (Apr 12)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS gordon b slater (Apr 12)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Persio Pucci (Apr 12)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Chris Cappuccio (Apr 21)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Thomas Habets (Apr 23)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Claudio Jeker (Apr 23)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Chris Caputo (Apr 23)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Jake Khuon (Apr 12)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Jorge Amodio (Apr 12)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Bjørn Mork (Apr 13)
- Re: Mikrotik RouterOS Positively Optimistic (Apr 13)