nanog mailing list archives

Re: Router for Metro Ethernet


From: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale () comcast net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:12:25 -0500

Cisco rates it at 256mbps which places it above a NPE-400.

The 3825 says 179mbps on their spec sheet. Not sure where you are getting your numbers but they are way off.

All of those numbers are straight forwarding with nothing turned on and 64 byte packets. That way you get a nice idea of what the CPU can do.

tv
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Stewart" <nonobvious () gmail com>
To: <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dylan Ebner <dylan.ebner () crlmed com> wrote:
However, this router also has 2 100mb connections from local lans that it is also terminiating. For our 100mb metro e connections we use 3845s. The 100 mb service terminates into NM-GEs, which have a faster throughput than the hwics.

Be careful using 3845s for 100 Mbps connections or above - Cisco rates
them at 45 Mbps (and 3825 at half of that) but last time I checked
doesn't make any promises at faster than T3.  They're being
conservative about it, but one thing that really can burn the
horsepower is traffic shaping, which you need with some MetroE
carriers.


--
----
            Thanks;     Bill

Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far.
And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.




Current thread: