nanog mailing list archives
Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers
From: Arie Vayner <ariev () vayner net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:11:19 +0300
In IPv6 you should be able to advertise up to /48 with no problem... Arie On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> wrote:
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> said:1) Use different prefixes. A single prefix going down should not kill your entire network. (Nameservers and resolvers being unreachable breaks the whole Internet as far as users are concerned.)How do you do this in the IPv6 world, where I get a single /32? Will others accept announcements of two /33s to better handle things like this? -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers, (continued)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Joe Greco (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Phil Vandry (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Lyndon Nerenberg (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Joe Greco (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Chris Adams (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers John Kristoff (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Doug Barton (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Arie Vayner (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 16)