nanog mailing list archives

Re: end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy


From: Joakim Aronius <joakim () aronius com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:07 +0200

* Hannes Frederic Sowa (hannes () mailcolloid de) wrote:

But most people just don't care. My proposal is to have some kind of
sane defaults for them e.g. changing their prefix every week or in the
case of a reconnect. This would mitigate some of the many privacy
concerns in the internet a little bit. Of course all the already known
problems would still exist. And still people have to care about the
technology to reach a higher level of anonymity.

Ok. Lets assume that the ISP hands out new prefixes to the clients CPE each week. The CPE then advertises these 
prefixes on the clients home network. For clients accessing the internet this works fine (except perhaps a glitch 
during the switchover). 

But what about the internal communication in the customer premises? How do they connect to their NAS, media players, 
printers, TVs etc? Of course there is UPnP, DLNA and different other kinds of magic but I imagine that most home users 
actually configure IP addresses at some point. 

Constantly changing prefixes will ad another layer of complexity, things will break, and customers will be upset. (and 
quite frankly I don't think that you would gain that much privacy anyway) 

just my $.02

/Joakim



Current thread: