nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNSSEC and SSL
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns61 () hardakers net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:31:36 -0700
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:57:27 +0200, Mans Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org> said:
MN> The best option today is to run a full-service resolver on the host; The DNSSEC-Tools project has instrumented a large number of applications with an in-application validating resolver. Including OpenSSH (with a new auto-accept-keys option!), sendmail, postfix, libspf, thunderbird, lftp, wget, ncftp, ... -- Wes Hardaker My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/ My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
Current thread:
- DNSSEC and SSL ML (Aug 21)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Gary Buhrmaster (Aug 21)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 21)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL ML (Aug 22)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Mans Nilsson (Aug 22)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL bmanning (Aug 22)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Wes Hardaker (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Tony Finch (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Curtis Maurand (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Doug Barton (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL ML (Aug 22)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL bmanning (Aug 22)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Tony Finch (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Jakob Schlyter (Aug 23)
- Re: DNSSEC and SSL Barry Shein (Aug 23)