nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:33:16 -0600
Thanks. I think the DFP might be a better fit, but right now it's timing out. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared () puck nether net] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:39 AM To: frnkblk () iname com Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Maybe this is a good place to start.. http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/compare/ - Jared On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE, Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take
multiple
feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons. But I can't find that e-mail or website anywhere! Does anyone know where that listserv posting or website is? Frank
Current thread:
- IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Kevin Loch (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bryan Fields (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Morris (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Hank Nussbacher (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Morris (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk - iName.com (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)