nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
From: Scott Taylor <visitorlnx () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:02:02 -0500
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 20:37, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> wrote:
On 12/21/10 2:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from public route-view servers. AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%) Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%) GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%) Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%) Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%) TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%) Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)Sprint (AS1239) is sending 3,779 routes.
I'm seeing the following that haven't been mentioned yet: Internet 2 is sending - 4037 QWest AS209 is sending - 3974
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bjoern A. Zeeb (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Owen DeLong (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Taylor (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Joel Jaeggli (Dec 23)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Elliott, Andrew (Dec 24)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 25)