nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wireless IPv6
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:04:40 -0800
On 12/28/10 10:35 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
FWIW, the same does not appear to be true of the Verizon 3G network. (Not that anyone expected it to be.) My VZW device has a NATted v4 address and only link-local v6.
lack of a chipset support is a notable problem there.... joel
On Dec 28, 2010 1:26 PM, "Cameron Byrne" <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote: On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 E...Just to update the group, a helpful person sent me a screenshot of the VZW LTE connection manager, and it does indeed have a public IPv6 address an a 10.x.x.x IPv4 address. So, true to claim, the new LTE service available today on USB sticks is production dual-stack. Bravo! Cameron ====== http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta ======
Current thread:
- Wireless IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Christopher Morrow (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Richard Barnes (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Christopher Morrow (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Christopher Morrow (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Christopher Morrow (Dec 28)
- Re: Wireless IPv6 Ryan Rawdon (Dec 28)