nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:49:53 -0500
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
fair game for reverse billing. If it does, it's going to completely eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ^_^;
oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please? please? :) -chris
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Jeff Young (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Frank Bulk (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Jeffrey Lyon (Dec 02)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Frank Bulk (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Matthew Petach (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Christopher Morrow (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Joe Provo (Dec 03)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Brandon Ross (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Dec 02)