nanog mailing list archives
Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet.
From: Martin Hotze <M.Hotze () hotze com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:06:46 +0000
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:47:44 -0500 From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us> Subject: Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. To: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> Cc: nanog () nanog org
(...)
But there's a third mechanism worth considering as well: the caching proxy.
IMHO it is a waste of bandwidth to use IP/network-based infrastructure for stuff like unidirectional data - like distributing a movie (on demand or scheduled). In this case nothing beats a satellite transponder and a dish, also cost-wise. #m
Current thread:
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet., (continued)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Jack Bates (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Antonio Querubin (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Marshall Eubanks (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Antonio Querubin (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Antonio Querubin (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Marshall Eubanks (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Ken A (Dec 03)
- Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet. Marshall Eubanks (Dec 03)