nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:18:40 -0800
From: Tom Daly Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:41 PM To: George Bonser Cc: nanog () nanog org; Greg Whynott Subject: Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51A good topic might be ipv6 migration strategies: dual stack ornativev6 with nat64/dns64Alright, added. Are you volunteering to speak to one point or the other?
I might be happy to submit something written but won't be able to get there in person. Being a sole full-time parent causes some adjustment in priorities. I would certainly be interested in the opinions of others, too.
Current thread:
- Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Jac Kloots (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 John Kristoff (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Christian Pena (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 kris foster (Dec 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Scott Weeks (Dec 07)