nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Operational] Internet Police
From: Michael Smith <michael () hmsjr com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:31:03 -0500
How is "what to block" identified? ...by content key words? ..traffic profiles / signatures? Deny all, unless flow (addresses/protocol/port) is pre-approved / registered? What does the technical solution look like? Any solutions to maintain some semblance of freedom? On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> wrote:
On 12/9/2010 12:19 PM, Michael Smith wrote:So... if/when our employers are unable to resist the US Govt's demand that we "join in the national defense", wouldn't this community be the ones asked to guard the border?CALEA done
Current thread:
- [Operational] Internet Police Michael Smith (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Michael Smith (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police David Conrad (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Randy Bush (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jorge Amodio (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Michael Smith (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police mikea (Dec 09)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 09)