nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother
From: Ken <ken () sizone org>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:39:28 -0500
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jeff Wheeler said: >A read through this New York Times article on derivatives clearing, >and the exclusivity that big banks seek to maintain, would look very >much like an article on large-scale peering, to someone who is not >expert in both topics. The transit-free club and the "derivatives >dealers club" may have other similarities in the future, and it's >worth watching how further government regulation develops in this >area. It may lead to insight into how government might eventually >regulate ISPs seeking to become settlement-free. >http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/business/12advantage.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&src=busln dont think so. 'cyber' is a panicword, results in way different regulations. also, the top player's influences through backchannels on the regulation process would be vastly different in those two industries. /kc -- Ken Chase - ken () heavycomputing ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
Current thread:
- peering, derivatives, and big brother Jeff Wheeler (Dec 12)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Ken (Dec 12)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 12)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Laurent GUERBY (Dec 13)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 13)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Dorn Hetzel (Dec 13)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Steve Bertrand (Dec 16)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Laurent GUERBY (Dec 13)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother Ryan Finnesey (Dec 15)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Jeff Wheeler (Dec 15)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 15)