nanog mailing list archives
Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered?
From: Beavis <pfunix () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:20:17 -0600
I come across this interesting link. http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828&tag=nl.e036 Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure? I only see chaos ahead specially with ipv6 coming into the scene. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Disclaimer: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Current thread:
- Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Beavis (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Ken (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Beavis (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Jimmy Hess (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Joly MacFie (Dec 14)
- Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered? Ken (Dec 14)