nanog mailing list archives

Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:26:41 -0800



On 02/27/2010 03:49 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/02/2010 04:04, Phil Regnauld wrote:
     I'm not saying that political incentives (carrot & stick) or government
     regulations in the line of "implement IPv6 before X/Y or else..." have
     had any effect, except maybe in Japan:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Japanese government did two things:

      - tax incentivise ipv6 compliance
      - make meaningful ipv6 compliance mandatory when dealing with Japanese
government technical contracts.

The effect of this was to 1) create a direct financial incentive to deploy
meaningfully, and 2) create an indirect financial incentive to deploy ipv6
meaningfully.  Spot the pattern here?

If you are a network contractor for the US government or a vendor
selling network equipment to the DOD then you've had a similar
incentive, if it's not there, you're not going to end up on the approved
suppliers list.

Nick



Current thread: