nanog mailing list archives
Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:14:04 -0500
I agree - quick setup and no issues. A++ Would Peer Again -Jack Carrozzo On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca> wrote:
Thomas Magill wrote:In efforts to further protect us against threats I am considering establishing Bogon peers to enable me to filter unallocated address space. I am just wondering if this is a worthwhile step to take and if anyone has ran into any issues or points of concern that I may want to take into account. Thanks in advance for any input.I've used the service for a couple of years, and I find it works wonderfully. Newly distributed IANA blocks are removed promptly, so no need to worry about that. I peer with Cymru on my RTBH trigger boxes, which then redistribute the list to all edge gear which blackholes it (dest and source) thanks to uRPF. No manual config or rule manipulation. Steve
Current thread:
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering, (continued)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Tim Wilde (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Nathan Ward (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Rob Thomas (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Jack Carrozzo (Feb 12)
- RE: CYMRU Bogon Peering Thomas Magill (Feb 12)