nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns interceptors
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:42:20 -0500
On Feb 14, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:i am often on funky networks in funky places. e.g. the wireless in changi really sucked friday night. if i ssh tunneled, it would multiply the suckiness as tcp would have puked at the loss rate.You can always run your own local resolver... Or is there a reason that's unacceptable?
How does that help? It still sends port 53 requests to the authorities, which will be intercepted. -- TTFN, patrick
smb whacked me that i should use non-tcp tunnels. randy-- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0 () gmail com http://blog.godshell.com
Current thread:
- dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Jared Mauch (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Thompson (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Jim Richardson (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Oliver Gorwits (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Larry Sheldon (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Weiss (Feb 14)
- RE: dns interceptors Justin Krejci (Feb 18)
- Re: dns interceptors Jared Mauch (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Steven Bellovin (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)