nanog mailing list archives
Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:49:47 -0400
I've done it much larger then small networks. Dependency is much more related to gear used then network size. -jim On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
--- deleskie () gmail com wrote: From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com> Border/Core/Access is great thinking when your a sales rep for a vendor that sells under power kit. No reason for it any more. ----------------------------------------------- I'd imagine it depends on the network size. Collapsing functionality is doable for smaller sizes. Please elaborate. scott
Current thread:
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates, (continued)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates Steve Bertrand (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates Steve Bertrand (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates Steve Bertrand (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- Re: Location of upstream connections & BGP templates jim deleskie (Feb 17)