nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 25, Issue 90
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:07:38 -0600
Actually thanks, I just realized that after I hit send... It's for CentOS Mehmet On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:47 PM, nanog-request () nanog org wrote:
Message: 8 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:35:41 -0500 From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU> Subject: Re: centeralized server management solutions To: nanog () nanog org Message-ID: <20100220213541.GB5426 () angus ind WPI EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:29:38PM -0600, Mehmet Akcin wrote:Centralized solution and server wont be on the same network , but each will have internet access Drac cards come with Compact Flash cards Bandwidth may not be quite fast and latency might be higher when connecting to the centralized solution. Monitoring can be apart from the server maintenance solution as I already primarily use cacti/nagios/IMapper.You didn't specify what OS'es you deploy, but for Linux/Red Hat-like systems: PXE boot, Kickstart [1], Puppet [2], Bacula [3]. PXE/Kickstart/Puppet can be managed with Cobbler [4]. Foreman [5] is an alternative for managing Puppet hosts. [1] http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Installation_Guide-en-US/pt-install-advanced-deployment.html [2] http://reductivelabs.com/products/puppet/ [3] http://www.bacula.org/en/ [4] https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/ [5] http://theforeman.org/
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 25, Issue 90 Mehmet Akcin (Feb 20)