nanog mailing list archives

Re: he.net down/slow?

From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:01:22 -0800

Michael J. Hartwick wrote:

I have never understood how posting the "warning" at the bottom of the email
after you have already given up the "protected" information could possibly

be considered enforceable.

It might be useful to look at what some people in the legal business sayabout these disclaimers:


http://arborlaw.biz/blog/2007/07/19/legal-issues-in-email-disclaimers/

Current thread:

Re: he.net down/slow?, (continued)
- - - Re: he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? James Hess (Jan 09)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? goemon (Jan 09)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? JC Dill (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 09)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
    - RE: he.net down/slow? Michael J. Hartwick (Jan 11)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? JC Dill (Jan 11)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Jed Smith (Jan 07)
- 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) JC Dill (Jan 07)
  - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Seth Mattinen (Jan 07)
  - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Mike Lyon (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Matthew Kaufman (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) John Adams (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Paul Ferguson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Tim Burke (Jan 07)
  - RE: he.net down/slow? Paul Stewart (Jan 07)