nanog mailing list archives
Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google)
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:15:11 +0000
On 19/01/2010 12:13, Richard Barnes wrote:
FWIW, there has been some work in the IETF on creating protocols to allow pretty rich location information to be published in reverse DNS.
This would be good, but it must be remembered that this would only ever be one clue about where a user actually is; for example we can not expect people who use geo-ip to try to honour international copy rights to ever use it. Sadly ;-) Andy
Current thread:
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google), (continued)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Steven Bellovin (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Christopher Morrow (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Warren Kumari (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Richard Barnes (Jan 19)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Richard Barnes (Jan 19)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Jim Mercer (Jan 19)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Steven Bellovin (Jan 18)
- Re: New netblock Geolocate wrong (Google) Andy Davidson (Jan 19)