Re: EDNS (Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?)

[Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>]

> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:16:31 +0000
> From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
>
>       It would help if the BIND EDNS0 negotiation would not fall back to
>       the 512 byte limit - perhaps you could talk with the ISC developers
>       about that.

i don't agree that your proposed change would help with this problem at all.
but in any case nanog isn't the place to ask ISC to change BIND, nor is it
the place to discuss protocol implementation or interpretation.  i suggest
bind-users@, bind-workers@, dns-operations@, dnsop@, and/or namedroppers@,
depending on what aspect of your above-described concerns you focus on.