nanog mailing list archives

RE: Using /126 for IPv6 router links


From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:37:44 -0500

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Smith
[mailto:nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 23:07
To: TJ
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links

<<SNIP>>

I didn't realize "human friendly" was even a nominal design
consideration,
especially as different humans have different tolerances for defining
"friendly"  :)


This from people who can probably do decimal to binary conversion
and back again for IPv4 subnetting in their head and are proud of
it. Surely IPv6 hex to binary and back again can be the new party
trick? :-)


Hex-Binary-Decimal, and permutations thereof - always a great party trick
... if you hang out at the right parties!
/TJ



Current thread: