nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation.
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:44:09 -0400
Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net> writes:
Why contact his boss? It's not like he's on a rogue e-mail campaign, obviously the company told him to do this. Why not focus on more significant spam?
The "more significant spam" is largely handled by my anti-spam measures. Cluing Internap in to the fact that I not only don't buy from spammers myself but am more than happy to pass the word about their unethical business practices is the honorable and right thing to do. The fact that his e-mail campaign is approved by management does not make it "non-rogue", it only means that upper management is rogue. I have never been (nor now will I ever be) an InterNAP customer. -r
Current thread:
- [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 24)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Jeffrey Lyon (Jun 24)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 24)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Scott Leibrand (Jun 24)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Rich Kulawiec (Jun 27)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Paul Vixie (Jun 27)
- Re: [Bruce Hoffman] Thank-you for your recent participation. Jeffrey Lyon (Jun 24)