nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:10:41 -0500
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?We do?
yea, it doesn't seem to follow based on what I'd seen at a large network provider, more people multihome over time, for reasons related to business continuity... (the comments about multihoming and nat just seem sideways, as well) -chris
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space Marco Hogewoning (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- NANOG job board James Jones (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)