nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space - the lie
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:01:56 +0000
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:40:19AM -0600, Dan White wrote:
On 05/03/10 12:39 +0000, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:er... what part of dual-stack didn't you understand? dual-stack consumes exactly the same number of v4 and v6 addresses.I would expect the number of v6 addresses assigned to a host to be a multiple of the number of v4 addresses, depending on the type of host.
true that... i was being - perhaps - too literal.
imho - the path through the woods is an IVI-like solution.Or, dual stack today. When you've run out of IPv4 addresses for new end users, set them up an IPv6 HTTP proxy, SMTP relay and DNS resolver and/or charge a premium for IPv4 addresses when you start to sweat.
and then we are back to drc's comments.
-- Dan White
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space Jens Link (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie bmanning (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Cameron Byrne (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Suzanne Woolf (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie bmanning (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Jim Burwell (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Dan White (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie bmanning (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Dan White (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Cameron Byrne (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Andrews (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 07)