nanog mailing list archives
Re: CRS-3
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:45:57 -0500
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors. On Mar 9, 2010, at 17:31, Jake Khuon <khuon () neebu net> wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they are?"Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters isCisco. Then why bother hyping at all? Anyone who needs even a significant fraction of 322 Tbps is not going to ignore competitors.Come now. You know the answer to that. While technically true, by thatlogic, Cisco should never perform any press releases.
First, this wasn't a press release, this was an event they were hyping for quite a while. Second, doing a press release is fine, but even the most aggressive companies have a modicum of truth in their releases.
If they said "look at our cool new router", one could overlook obvious marketing BS like comparing to the T640 instead of the T1600. But claiming to "revolutionize" the Internet while being afraid to compare yourself to your chief competitor's flagship product is just pathetic.
-- TTFN,
patrick
Current thread:
- RE: CRS-3, (continued)
- RE: CRS-3 Arjan van der Oest (Mar 09)
- Re: CRS-3 Joel Esler (Mar 09)