nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:54:24 -0500
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Chris Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com>wrote:
To pile on in the spirit of "if people don't complain, nothing will change" - is VZB still insisting on filtering >/32 at their peers? While ARIN is allocating /40s and /48s directly?
I believe so ... will be even more impactful as LTE gets deployed. Another nit - They are also blocking Protocol41 on their EV-DO network. While this is a 'noble, if poorly thought out, effort' to prevent IPv6 from impacting their cel phone users - it kind of messes up those of us who have aircards (and got used to 6to4 for quick and dirty IPv6 connectivity). /TJ
Current thread:
- IPv6 enabled carriers? Charles Mills (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- RE: IPv6 enabled carriers? George Bonser (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Michael Hallgren (Mar 10)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Chris Woodfield (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? TJ (Mar 11)
- Filtered 6to4, what else to use (Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?) Jeroen Massar (Mar 11)
- Re: Filtered 6to4, what else to use (Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?) TJ (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Christopher Morrow (Mar 11)
- Re: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? cb . list6 (Mar 11)
- Message not available
- RE: IPv6 enabled carriers? TJ (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Christopher Morrow (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Cameron Byrne (Mar 11)
- Re: IPv6 enabled carriers? Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- RE: IPv6 enabled carriers? John van Oppen (Mar 10)