nanog mailing list archives

Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8


From: Bryan Irvine <sparctacus () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:40:14 -0800

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net> wrote:
Axel Morawietz wrote:

Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:

[...] Its
amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.

one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.*
for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones.
And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this
route from external. ;)

If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years,
perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?

Cisco has an interesting write-up on this:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_10-3/103_awkward.html


Current thread: