nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Naming Conventions
From: William Yardley <nanog () veggiechinese net>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:34:03 -0700
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
Going forward, I'd like to examine a better method to identify the devices.... does anyone have published standards on what they use or that of other networks and maybe even why they chose those methods?
Looked through the thread figuring someone else would have mentioned this one, but (unless I missed it), they didn't. So sorry if you've seen this already, but I think this presentation is a really good take on the subject. http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog31/abstracts.php?pt=NjExJm5hbm9nMzE=&nm=nanog31
Current thread:
- RE: Network Naming Conventions, (continued)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik L (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions bmanning (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Ravi Pina (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Rubens Kuhl (Mar 14)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Joe Greco (Mar 14)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 15)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions gordon b slater (Mar 16)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik Soosalu (Mar 16)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions William F. Maton Sotomayor (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Barry Shein (Mar 13)