nanog mailing list archives

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

From: Adam Waite <awaite () tuenti com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:55:43 +0100

Hm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run
network...

Not since 1992......what you're looking for these days is NIPRnet andSIPRnet, and ESnet, etc, etc, etc.


ARPANET only lives on in reverse dns.....

Current thread:

RE: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Arjan van der Oest (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Adam Waite (Mar 01)
  - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Larry Sheldon (Mar 01)
    - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 01)
    - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Larry Sheldon (Mar 01)
    - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Joel Jaeggli (Mar 01)
  - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
    - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Antonio Querubin (Mar 01)
  - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Kevin Oberman (Mar 01)
    - Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) David Conrad (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)

(Thread continues...)