nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:26:39 -0600
On May 10, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
this is a matter of risk analysis. No secure routing means we'll continue to see the occasional high profile outage which is dealt with very quickly.
If 3 weeks (e.g., the recent 'i root w/China incident) is "very quickly" then we're operating on different timescales.
My gut instinct tells me that secure routing and the rpki venture well into the realm of negative returns.
I believe 'sucks less' falls into the realm of positive, so here we disagree. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?, (continued)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Joe Abley (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Marshall Eubanks (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jorge Amodio (May 10)