nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:08:41 -0600
On 11/11/2010 12:50 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
Point-to-point (non-multi-access) interfaces only
Yeah, it's evil. I don't see a cisco equiv to state it's point to point (you can tell ISIS it is, but not define the interface as such). However, I'm not sure of the limitations or associated problems, you might try:
FastEthernet0/0.1 encap dot1q 1 native ip unnumbered loopback1 !Haven't tested it, but it utilizes the access code in IOS for subscriber management using vlans. As long as you have a route pointing out the interface, it will allow the traffic to go through.
Jack
Current thread:
- Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs James Smallacombe (Nov 10)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs David Freedman (Nov 10)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Dave Temkin (Nov 10)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs James Smallacombe (Nov 11)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Jack Bates (Nov 11)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Dave Temkin (Nov 10)
- RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Jeff Saxe (Nov 11)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs David Freedman (Nov 11)
- RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Ryan Finnesey (Nov 11)
- RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs Seth (Nov 11)
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs David Freedman (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback Ips David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback Ips nanog (Nov 11)