nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low end, cool CPE.
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:26 -0800
On 11/11/2010 5:56 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Last time I looked into this, the small Fortinet boxes and the Juniper NetScreen-5 or -25 were in this class. Juniper now has the SSG to replace the small NetScreen devices.I'm using a Fortinet box to do many of the things on your list, including IPv6 support, at home.
And I forgot to mention an even more relevant operational note... quite a few of these boxes can support quite a few more security zones (or profiles or whatever they call them) than they have ports. Consider VLAN-trunking one of these into a low-end VLAN-capable switch as a port expander.
Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- Low end, cool CPE. Leo Bicknell (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Andrew Kirch (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. David Coulson (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Fearghas McKay (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Charles N Wyble (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Byers, Micah (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Owen DeLong (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Adam Leff (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Tim Jackson (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Jason Bertoch (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Michael Loftis (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Michael Loftis (Nov 16)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Marco Hogewoning (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Eugen Leitl (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Francois Menard (Nov 12)