nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low end, cool CPE.
From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:03:00 +0000
On 12 Nov 2010, at 12:55, Bjørn Mork wrote:
This is far too diffuse. You'll get a "yes, we've got IPv6". You should at least add - IPv6 packet filtering and policy management (at least simple access lists) <snip> The point is: We've been asking for "IPv6" for too long. That's just one bit in a packet header. We need to start asking for the features we expect, which is a lot more than that bit.
For IPv6 CPE requirements, you might want to look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07 and comment on the IETF v6ops list. Tim
Current thread:
- Re: Low end, cool CPE., (continued)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Jason Bertoch (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Michael Loftis (Nov 11)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Michael Loftis (Nov 16)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Matthew Kaufman (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Marco Hogewoning (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Eugen Leitl (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Francois Menard (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Marco Hogewoning (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Charles N Wyble (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Francois Menard (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Bjørn Mork (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Tim Chown (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- RE: Low end, cool CPE. Wallace Keith (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Jason Lewis (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Eugen Leitl (Nov 12)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Joel Jaeggli (Nov 16)
- Re: Low end, cool CPE. Eugen Leitl (Nov 12)
- RE: Low end, cool CPE. Martin Hotze (Nov 12)