nanog mailing list archives

Re: Network management software with high detailed traffic report


From: Diogo Montagner <diogo.montagner () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:34:00 +0800

I am just curios what kind of application/network requires this
aggressive monitoring.

Is it possible to share this information ?

Cheers

On 11/26/10, Ivan Brunello <ivan.brunello () gmail com> wrote:
Sure it upsets.
We have a bunch of average-populated 6500s,
using the default max age (which was, as far as I remember, 5) made
the switches very slow in responding to SNMP queries.
set them to 10, and, Gotcha! everything works very well.

ivan

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:25:25 +0200
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnet gr>
Subject: Re: Network management software with high detailed traffic
       report
To: nanog () nanog org
Message-ID: <4CEBB2B5.5090507 () forthnet gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

There is also CSCsg23226 which might be related.

--
Tassos


Nick Hilliard wrote on 23/11/2010 01:35:
On 22/11/2010 22:56, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Does "service counters max age" help in any way?*
*According to Cisco, setting it too low might upset the snmp counters.*

https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/command/reference/cf_r1.html#wp1067159


The "Usage Guidelines" are instructive. :-)

Although the update interval defaults to 5 seconds, it still appears
to update every 9 seconds on my boxes.

Nick





-- 
Sent from my mobile device

./diogo -montagner


Current thread: