nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?


From: Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:26:10 -0500

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:20, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net]
On 10/26/2010 1:01 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

Wait... If you are issuing space to ISPs that are multihomed, they
should be getting their own addresses. Even if they aren't
multihomed, they should probably be getting their own addresses. Why
would you be supplying them with address space if they are an ISP?


Because they are my customer. They don't know much about RIRs, paying
membership fees, etc. They just know they want address space, and I
provide that.

If they are ISPs and don't know much about RIRs, can you please name them
and provide their ASNs ... oh, wait ... they won't have an ASN if they don't
know about RIRs and fees and such.

Something isn't passing the smell test here.

This is actually not that uncommon. You see it a lot in the smaller level.
I had several such clients at my last job. They want to be multi-homed for
redundancy, but either don't have enough space, or don't want to pay full
time people, so they use a small to midsize ISP and their space and
assistance to set up.

-Blake


Current thread: