nanog mailing list archives
Re: router lifetime
From: Franck Martin <franck () genius com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
I'm looking at various scenario, but basically it is looking at IPv6 in fact. It seems to me, that using a router/network appliance today for IPv6 will need to be replaced in 3 years or less. Looking at past, anything older than 3 years is not a viable solution for deploying IPv6. So I feel that routing/network appliance equipment have a life cycle similar to a PC, despite the fact as someone pointed out, they will run fine for many many years. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heath Jones" <hj1980 () gmail com> To: "Franck Martin" <franck () genius com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 4:34:40 PM Subject: Re: router lifetime
How long do you keep a router in production? What is your cycle for replacement of equipment?
Hi Franck It really depends on the type of network you are running, the rate at which new features & bandwidth are required, and the availability of software and hardware upgrades. Also, in a lot of cases it is vendor driven - devices that are still very much in production are forced to be replaced because of vendor product lifecycle and the phasing out of support, even when serving their requirements well. Care to elaborate a little more on your planned scenario? Cheers Heath
Current thread:
- router lifetime Franck Martin (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Heath Jones (Oct 02)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Franck Martin (Oct 02)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime jim deleskie (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Mark Smith (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Franck Martin (Oct 03)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Chris Woodfield (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Heath Jones (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Patrick Stueck (Oct 02)