nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:29:27 -0400
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:01 PM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
ula really never should an option... except for a short lived lab, nothing permanent.I have a few candidate networks for it. Mostly networks used for clustering or database access where they are just a flat LAN with no "gateway". No layer 3 gets routed off that subnet and the only things talking on it are directly attached to it.
why not just use link-local then? eventually you'll have to connect that network with another one, chances of overlap (if the systems support real revenue) are likely too high to want to pay the renumbering costs, so even link-local isn't a 100% win :( globally-unique is really the best option all around. -chris
Current thread:
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses), (continued)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Jeroen Massar (Oct 21)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 21)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Leo Bicknell (Oct 21)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 21)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Adrian Chadd (Oct 21)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) Mark Andrews (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) David Conrad (Oct 31)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Matthew Kaufman (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Matthew Petach (Oct 31)
- RE: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses) George Bonser (Oct 31)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 31)