nanog mailing list archives

Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -Unique local addresses)


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:29:27 -0400

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:01 PM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
ula really never should an option... except for a short lived lab,
nothing permanent.

I have a few candidate networks for it.  Mostly networks used for
clustering or database access where they are just a flat LAN with no
"gateway".  No layer 3 gets routed off that subnet and the only things
talking on it are directly attached to it.

why not just use link-local then? eventually you'll have to connect
that network with another one, chances of overlap (if the systems
support real revenue) are likely too high to want to pay the
renumbering costs, so even link-local isn't a 100% win :(
globally-unique is really the best option all around.

-chris


Current thread: