nanog mailing list archives

RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)

From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:08:25 +0000

If it passes SPF we remove a few points of the spam weight.


I would rethink this practice.  Many spammers publish SPF valid records these days precisely because of this.

Nathan

Current thread:

Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408), (continued)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Rich Kulawiec (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
  - Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Tony Finch (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Kevin Stange (Oct 04)
  - Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Stefan Bethke (Oct 05)
  - Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 05)
- re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nick Olsen (Oct 04)
  - RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
    - Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Jared Mauch (Oct 04)