RE: RIP Justification

[Jonathon Exley <Jonathon.Exley () kordia co nz>]

It also scales better from the SP point of view. If you have 1000 L3VPN services on your PE node using OSPF to the 
customer that would require a lot of memory for the multiple LSDBs and a lot of CPU for the SPF calculations.
BGP is nicer but the reality is that many enterprises don't have the know-how. 

Jonathon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1980 () gmail com] 
Sent: Saturday, 2 October 2010 12:39 a.m.
To: Tim Franklin
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: RIP Justification

On 1 October 2010 12:19, Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org> wrote:
> Or BGP.  Why not?

Of course, technically you could use almost any routing protocol.
OSPF and IS-IS would require more configuration and maintenance, BGP even more still.

I think this is a pretty good example though of how RIPv2 is probably the most appropriate for the job. It doesnt 
require further configuration from the provider side as new sites are added and is very simple to set up and maintain.

This email and attachments: are confidential; may be protected by
privilege and copyright; if received in error may not be used,copied,
or kept; are not guaranteed to be virus-free; may not express the
views of Kordia(R); do not designate an information system; and do not
give rise to any liability for Kordia(R).