nanog mailing list archives
Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6
From: Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:02:22 -0700
Bahh had my head turned around and brain fried on a Friday. I was more curious about /64 vs /126 from management perspective. Thanks everyone for answering offline as well, I got my questions answered. Zaid On 10/15/10 12:26 PM, "Zaid Ali" <zaid () zaidali com> wrote:
SO I have been turning up v6 with multiple providers now and notice that some choose /64 for numbering interfaces but one I came across use a /126. A /126 is awfully large (for interface numbering) and I am curious if there is some rationale behind using a /126 instead of a /64. Zaid
Current thread:
- Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Zaid Ali (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Scott Howard (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Zaid Ali (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Franck Martin (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Brandon Kim (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Joel Jaeggli (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Dobbins, Roland (Oct 16)
- RE: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Brandon Kim (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)