nanog mailing list archives
Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
From: Franck Martin <franck () genius com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:22:38 +1200 (FJT)
You give a /64 to the end users (home/soho), and /48 to multi homed organization (or bigger orgs that use more than one network internally) and get a /32 if you are an ISP. See also the discussion about what to use in p2p links. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Kim" <brandon.kim () brandontek com> To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Sunday, 17 October, 2010 8:58:57 AM Subject: RE: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Thanks everyone who responded. This list is such a valuable wealth of information. Apparently I was wrong about the /64 as that should be /32 so thanks for that correction.... Thanks again especially on a Saturday weekend!
From: rdobbins () arbor net To: nanog () nanog org Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:09:43 +0000 Subject: Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:Then move on to the Internet which as with most things is where the most cuurent if not helpful information resides.Eric Vyncke's IPv6 security book is definitely worthwhile, as well, in combination with Schudel & Smith's infrastructure security book (the latter isn't IPv6-specific, but is the best book out there on infrastructure security): <http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587055945> <http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587053365> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Sell your computer and buy a guitar.
Current thread:
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Franck Martin (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Brandon Kim (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Joel Jaeggli (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Dobbins, Roland (Oct 16)
- RE: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Brandon Kim (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Franck Martin (Oct 16)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 17)
- RE: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Tony Hain (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Randy Carpenter (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Jon Lewis (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Doug Barton (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Seth Mattinen (Oct 18)
- Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Mark Smith (Oct 18)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 15)