nanog mailing list archives

Re: network name 101100010100110.net


From: Per Carlson <pelle () hemmop com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:07:41 +0200

Technically, no.

But you probably fancy annoying people. I wouldn't imaging anyone typing
that right on the first attempt.
On 17 Oct 2010 06:47, "Day Domes" <daydomes () gmail com> wrote:
I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
network.  I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
any issues with this?



Current thread: