Re: largest OSPF core

[Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:32:30PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
> > > With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
> > OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
> > than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
> > implementations?
> > >
> > You left out the option of using ospf3 to do both v4 and v6. Works on
> > juniper and foundry at least.
> >
> > Owen
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/OSPFv3_aag.pdf
>
> Thank you. Apparently Cisco supports it (or something like it) too.

Seems silly to migrate your existing OSPFv2 to an extra instance of 
OSPFv3, leaving 2 separate OSPFv3 instances.  Why not just stick with 
your existing OSPFv2 and add OSPFv3 for IPv6?  Or if you want to 
migrate your IPv4 IGP, go directly to IS-IS so you can have a single 
link-state database, single process, etc. for both IPv4 and IPv6.